Don't confuse me with facts - my mind is made up?

Dammit!

President Obama has made the decision to send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan in order to "go after the guys who attacked us on 9/11."

Go to war for "peace?" I don't think so.

Architect Richard Gage speaks about the truth and lies of 9/11 and the "impossible" freefall speeds at which those towers came down.



"Nothing good is ever created by deception. Not even the smallest untruth, not even the most well-intended "white lie," will produce benefit in the long run. So tell your truth as soon as you know it."
- Quote from Neale Donald Walsch

Professor Niels Harrit of Copenhagen University in Denmark, who is an expert in nano-chemistry, says that they found such large quantities of nano-thermite in the dust from the WTC, that he believes it must have been brought into the WTC site by the tons.

Professor Steven Jones who also played a major role in this ground-breaking research, refers to this startling new evidence as “the loaded gun.”

So how come the "Official 9/11 Commission" did not look into the possible use of explosives?
Because they didn't want us to know about that.

Why?
Maybe it was an inside job?

And how come Bush and Rumsfeld refused to allow our army to capture Osama Bin Laden?
Because OBL didn't do it - despite the "official story" even the FBI says that there is no evidence on this man. And besides they don't make high tech nano-thermite in caves in Afghanistan.

So did jet fuel (which is kerosene) "melt" the steel in those towers?
No. Jet fuel can not melt steel.

Can a hundred story plus building "pancake" in freefall?
No. You don't need more than 9th grade physics to understand this.

If you want a full length DVD on this subject with a whole lot of information (trust me, you've only seen a small piece of it here), contact me via email below and I'll lend you my copies:

BLUEPRINT FOR 9/11 TRUTH: The Architecture of Destruction
and
ZERO: an investigation into 9/11

These films made it impossible for me to accept the "official" version of the "911" tragedy any longer. It organizes the wealth of available material in such a way as leave no room for doubt.

SeeNewEvidence at gmail dot com




2 comments:

Deb C said...

Hello Karin Wells,
great information and questions about what really happened on 9/11!
I also share your belief that we were lied to by the govt and the media---and the deceit continues. I used to love Obama but am becoming more and more disenchanted with him carrying on the myth and basing flawed national policy on it. How many more of our dear soldiers must die for the lie? It outrages me and that is why like you, I am an active 9/11 truther AND and art teacher AND an artist. Keep on dispensing this important information....maybe it will convince other artists to wake up to the fact that they need to look at more information, and ultimately come to the conclusion that we as a nation must demand a new investigation--one that was not conducted as the 911 Commission was--the classic definition of an inside job if I ever saw one. ALL BOGUS.
Hang in there, Karin, I am with you!
Deb C

My Painting Studio said...

Thanks for your comments Deb.

This is a verrrry interesting paper - lots of info here including first person accounts by fire fighters. You can download this from the firefightersfor9/11truth website: http://bit.ly/7Y584g

"Summary of Evidence of Controlled Demolition at the World Trade Center"

Sounds dull - but it isn't. It's a page turner.