What is “BuildingWhat?”

Supposedly we artists are trained to "see" what we're looking at - HA!

On 9/11/2001 I couldn't believe what my eyes "saw' on TV - so I believed the lies that they told me instead.

I suppose it made me feel less frightened to "know"that the crime was "solved" within 24 hours and that we "knew" who did it - just like on a TV Crime Show!

The assumption that America was attacked by Muslims on 9/11 just isn't true.

If (hopefully) you search for the truth of 9/11 - you'll find it is like trying to take a sip of water from a firehose. There is plenty of evidence. But if you're going to "see" it - you have to look.

And for many years, I am embarrassed to say that looked and acted like this:

Then this happened - I finally saw the fact that it was a Controlled Demolition that brought those three WTC buildings down on 9/11. That it was very painful to deal with is an understatement.

So I'll share this worldwide campaign with other artists to raise awareness of World Trade Center's Building #7 in the hope that you will be able to "see what you're looking at" too.

Seen once on mainstream media on 9/11/2001, this mysterious building #7 is never mentioned again - not even in the 9/11 Commission Report!

More than eight years after the tragedy of September 11, 2001, New York Supreme Court Justice Edward H. Lehner was hearing arguments in a courtroom less than a mile from Ground Zero about a ballot initiative to launch a new investigation of the 9/11 attacks.

When the lawyer for the plaintiffs sponsoring the initiative explained that the 9/11 Commission report left many unanswered questions, including “Why did Building 7 come down,” the Judge replied quizzically, “Building what?”

Like Judge Lehner, millions of people do not know or remember only vaguely that a third tower called World Trade Center Building 7 also collapsed on September 11, 2001.

In any other situation, the complete, free fall collapse of a 47-story skyscraper would be played over and over on the news. It would be discussed for years to come and building design codes would be completely rewritten. So, why does no one know about Building 7? And why did Building 7 come down?

The answers to these questions have far-reaching implications for our society. The goal of the “BuildingWhat?” campaign is to raise awareness of Building 7 so that together we can begin to address these questions.

What is Building 7?

Building 7 was a 47-story skyscraper and was part of the World Trade Center complex. Built in 1984, it would have been the tallest high-rise in 33 states in the United States. It collapsed at 5:20 pm on September 11, 2001. It was not hit by an airplane and suffered minimal damage compared to other buildings much closer to the Twin Towers.

Watch footage of the "collapse" of of Building 7:

This is the location of Building 7 in relation to the rest of the World Trade Center complex. It wasn't hit by an airplane - but it "fell down" anyway...it is America's biggest "secret" hiding in plain sight.

To learn more about World Trade Center Building 7, see: 7 Facts about Building 7.

Artists, believe your eyes:

If it looks like a controlled demolition, acts like a controlled demolition - it probably is IS a controlled demolition.

Here is the evidence (with links):

Free Fall Collapse

Collapse Model

Sulfidated Steel

Explosive Residues

Eyewitnesses

Foreknowledge

Destruction of Evidence

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is a non-partisan association of architects, engineers, and affiliates whose work is dedicated to the victims, families and all others throughout the world affected by the tragic events of September 11, 2001 and its aftermath.

Their mission is to research, compile, and disseminate scientific evidence relative to the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, calling for a truly open and independent investigation and supporting others in the pursuit of justice.

Please join us, it's time to stop ignoring this elephant and show him the exit:

Patriots Question 9/11

And So,

Dear Readers,

My Father, Carl W. Christensen

20" x 24" Oil on linen

I'll leave you on the 9th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks with the words of my father (Chemical Engineer and Inventor) who said:

"Most people see - but they don't observe."

And he sure was right about that...dang.

With Love,

Karin Wells

Observe the Slideshow above and note that you're looking at Controlled Demolition.

Please join me in the growing 9/11 Truth Movement - there will be one near you wherever you are in the world. We're spreading the word however we can....we have no choice as the media refuses to do its job.

I am now a proud signator on:

http://actorsandartistsfor911truth.com/

Please look at the evidence and join me.

Dear Readers,

I've gotten so many letters of concern from you all – thank you. I want to assure you that I haven't quit painting nor do I intend to abandon this blog.

But something huge shifted in my thinking....and it was because of a portrait I painted.

I wrote the letter to the editor of my local newspaper (below) and it's been crazy around my studio ever since. My focus has been on learning and sharing information about what really happened on 9/11 and it ate up a lot of time and energy.

In the eyes of some, this has trashed my reputation and my career - telling the Truth isn't easy - but if I am to live with myself, I have to do this.

I've been putting this information on yet another blog: http://nhtruth.blogspot.com Please check it out and use the index in the right-hand column.

So how does this relate to my art? This has been the tough part to figure out for sure.

So far my plan is to begin working on a series of portraits entitled “People Who Tell The Truth.” Stay tuned and I'll explain as I continue.

Meanwhile here is my Letter to the Editor I wrote that started it all:

Letter to the Editor of the Keene Sentinel:

I am a portrait artist, and my world radically shifted when I was hired to paint a young woman who died in the WTC North Tower on 9/11/01. Her image captured my heart and I couldn’t rest until I learned more about why and how she died.

I had never before considered the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job. It was easy to ignore those nagging rumors that the three buildings collapsed as a result of controlled demolition. But as I began to read, the “official” story made less and less sense.

When I finally saw the scientific evidence of controlled demolition, I was shocked. Since then I’ve heard credible eyewitnesses and whistleblowers speaking out – but the media isn’t listening and doesn’t report.

The major problem I have found in talking about 9/11 is that most people simply refuse to examine the evidence.

It is understandable – but not acceptable – that they prefer to ignore those things that disturb a comfortable view of reality. It is hard for anybody to question deeply held beliefs – even when all evidence clearly shows that belief to be mistaken.

In my efforts to spread the truth of 9/11, I have joined “Vote for Answers NH.org” and am seeking signatures on a petition to ask our town to call for a new and independent investigation of all of the evidence surrounding the tragic events of 9/11.

If you are reading this and are one of those who can muster the courage to examine new evidence, please contact me and I’ll give or send you a DVD entitled “9/11: Blueprint for Truth.” You can also access this information for yourself at http://www.ae911truth.org

This is a non-partisan issue and signers are Republican, Democrat and Independent.

Sincerely,

Karin Wells
Peterborough, New Hampshire

And my offer of that Free DVD holds for ALL of you too. If you want one contact me at : See New Evidence at gmail dot com

Believe your eyes - they'll tell you no lies!

This is what a controlled demolition looks like.

This is WTC Building #7 being demolished at near free-fall speed on 9/11/2001. It was exploded from the bottom up - whereas both Twin Towers* were exploded from the top down.

(*Note that Jet Fuel (kerosene) does not come within 1000 degrees F of melting steel. You just cannot break the Laws of Physics.)

See the top "crimp" as WTC Building #7 begins to fall straight down into its own footprint? This is classic demolition.

Note that Building 7 was not hit by an airplane but this steel framed and reinforced 47 story sky scraper collapsed anyhow.

Building #7 contained CIA Headquarters and all of the Enron and Worldcom evidence. Even though the Insurance Company paid off because it was classified as part of the "Terrorist Attack" - nowhere in the official 9/11 Commossion Report is the destruction of this building mentioned.

You can read more about Building #7 here and see why I support a new investigation into 9/11.

Don't confuse me with facts - my mind is made up?

Dammit!

President Obama has made the decision to send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan in order to "go after the guys who attacked us on 9/11."

Go to war for "peace?" I don't think so.

Architect Richard Gage speaks about the truth and lies of 9/11 and the "impossible" freefall speeds at which those towers came down.

"Nothing good is ever created by deception. Not even the smallest untruth, not even the most well-intended "white lie," will produce benefit in the long run. So tell your truth as soon as you know it."

- Quote from Neale Donald Walsch

Professor Niels Harrit of Copenhagen University in Denmark, who is an expert in nano-chemistry, says that they found such large quantities of nano-thermite in the dust from the WTC, that he believes it must have been brought into the WTC site by the tons.

Professor Steven Jones who also played a major role in this ground-breaking research, refers to this startling new evidence as “the loaded gun.”

So how come the "Official 9/11 Commission" did not look into the possible use of explosives?

Because they didn't want us to know about that.

Why?

Maybe it was an inside job?

And how come Bush and Rumsfeld refused to allow our army to capture Osama Bin Laden?

Because OBL didn't do it - despite the "official story" even the FBI says that there is no evidence on this man. And besides they don't make high tech nano-thermite in caves in Afghanistan.

So did jet fuel (which is kerosene) "melt" the steel in those towers?

No. Jet fuel can not melt steel.

Can a hundred story plus building "pancake" in freefall?

No. You don't need more than 9th grade physics to understand this.

If you want a full length DVD on this subject with a whole lot of information (trust me, you've only seen a small piece of it here), contact me via email below and I'll lend you my copies:

BLUEPRINT FOR 9/11 TRUTH: The Architecture of Destruction

and

ZERO: an investigation into 9/11

These films made it impossible for me to accept the "official" version of the "911" tragedy any longer. It organizes the wealth of available material in such a way as leave no room for doubt.

SeeNewEvidence at gmail dot com

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Fire Fighters for 9/11 Truth

If you like the technical, this is a .pdf entitled "Summary of Evidence of Controlled Demolition at the World Trade Center." This work is dedicated to Chief of Department Peter J. Ganci Jr. and his 342 fellow F.D.N.Y. members killed in action while trying to save others.

Eight Years Later

No, I'm not a "conspiracy theory" person. But today, the eighth anniversary of 9/11, I remain confused.

I watched in horror eight years ago as two airplanes in NYC hit two buildings - and inexplicably three buildings fell down!

I didn't understand then then and I don't understand it now.

When the 9/11 Commission Report finally came out, I read the entire thing.

Frustratingly there wasn't even one mention of why Building #7 also collapsed that day.

I'd guess that 9/11 was the most poorly investigated crime and yet the most highly censored story in American history - and I just don't get it.

My friend Dr. John Wyndham has a PhD in Physics and he says that the science just doesn't add up.

I have included a copy of his letter to the editor of our local newspaper where John sums it up nicely:

That explosive residue (nanothermite) in has been found to be in abundance in WTC dust samples chills me to the bone.

I'm not sure why, but most people's eyes glaze over on this subject and they seem to want to dismiss all legitimate questions despite the fact that many of the "official answers" just don't add up.

Shouldn't the "who" and "how" have been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt before our Government blundered into two wars as "revenge for 9/11?"

If we knew that a planned demolition of these three buildings happened, would it change any of our ideas about who we think planned and carried out the attack?

Even now I am struggling to wrap my mind around this.

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth was founded in 2006 by Richard Gage, a San Francisco Bay area based architect.

This is a trailer for a stunning movie called "Blueprint for Truth - The Architecture of Destruction" - and the science presented is clear.

You can buy the DVD or watch it free online.

It is an organization of architectural and engineering professionals who are calling for a new investigation into the cause of the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building #7 (also known as the Solomon building).

Gage criticized the government agency NIST for not having investigated the complete sequence of the collapse of the World Trade Center towers and claims that "the official explanation of the total destruction of the World Trade Center skyscrapers has explicitly failed to address the massive evidence for explosive demolition."