The iPad Saves My Sanity!


If you have read much of this blog, you will have noticed that I dearly love gadgets.

The iPad is a little pricey so it took me a while to "talk myself" into getting one. However, had known how much it would help me in painting a portrait - I would have done it much sooner!


You're looking at the cheapest model iPad with the generic black case sold in the Apple Store. I applied a clear plastic to the surface to protect the screen.

I clipped it to my easel with an ordinary hardware store Electrician's Clamp and a rubber band holds the cover back.

The iPad screen has a very high resolution and I can - with a touch of a finger - enlarge and move a reference picture around very easily. I can paint 10+ hours without having to recharge this device. (I can also listen to music or audiobooks as I work).

The advantage of the iPod screen is that I can now see a variation of subtle tone - more than in any photograph I could ever print out.


This gadget is an ideal way to display reference photographs - and my portfolio.

It is is amazing to me how many of us artists have really poor vision. This gadget allows me to blow up any feature and actually SEE the structure.

I can paint faster, more easily and more accurately now - my only regret is that I didn't get an iPad much sooner.

What is “BuildingWhat?”


Supposedly we artists are trained to "see" what we're looking at - HA!

On 9/11/2001 I couldn't believe what my eyes "saw' on TV - so I believed the lies that they told me instead.


I suppose it made me feel less frightened to "know"that the crime was "solved" within 24 hours and that we "knew" who did it - just like on a TV Crime Show!


If (hopefully) you search for the truth of 9/11 - you'll find it is like trying to take a sip of water from a firehose. There is plenty of evidence. But if you're going to "see" it - you have to look.

And for many years, I am embarrassed to say that looked and acted like this:


So I'll share this worldwide campaign with other artists to raise awareness of World Trade Center's Building #7 in the hope that you will be able to "see what you're looking at" too.

Photobucket

Seen once on mainstream media on 9/11/2001, this mysterious building #7 is never mentioned again - not even in the 9/11 Commission Report!

More than eight years after the tragedy of September 11, 2001, New York Supreme Court Justice Edward H. Lehner was hearing arguments in a courtroom less than a mile from Ground Zero about a ballot initiative to launch a new investigation of the 9/11 attacks.

When the lawyer for the plaintiffs sponsoring the initiative explained that the 9/11 Commission report left many unanswered questions, including “Why did Building 7 come down,” the Judge replied quizzically, “Building what?”


Like Judge Lehner, millions of people do not know or remember only vaguely that a third tower called World Trade Center Building 7 also collapsed on September 11, 2001.



In any other situation, the complete, free fall collapse of a 47-story skyscraper would be played over and over on the news. It would be discussed for years to come and building design codes would be completely rewritten. So, why does no one know about Building 7? And why did Building 7 come down?

The answers to these questions have far-reaching implications for our society. The goal of the “BuildingWhat?” campaign is to raise awareness of Building 7 so that together we can begin to address these questions.


What is Building 7?

Building 7 was a 47-story skyscraper and was part of the World Trade Center complex. Built in 1984, it would have been the tallest high-rise in 33 states in the United States. It collapsed at 5:20 pm on September 11, 2001. It was not hit by an airplane and suffered minimal damage compared to other buildings much closer to the Twin Towers.

Watch footage of the "collapse" of of Building 7:



This is the location of Building 7 in relation to the rest of the World Trade Center complex. It wasn't hit by an airplane - but it "fell down" anyway...it is America's biggest "secret" hiding in plain sight.


To learn more about World Trade Center Building 7, see: 7 Facts about Building 7.

Artists, believe your eyes:
If it looks like a controlled demolition, acts like a controlled demolition - it probably is IS a controlled demolition.

Here is the evidence (with links):



And So,
Dear Readers,



My Father, Carl W. Christensen
20" x 24" Oil on linen

I'll leave you on the 9th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks with the words of my father (Chemical Engineer and Inventor) who said:

"Most people see - but they don't observe."

And he sure was right about that...dang.

With Love,
Karin Wells



Observe the Slideshow above and note that you're looking at Controlled Demolition.

Please join me in the growing 9/11 Truth Movement - there will be one near you wherever you are in the world. We're spreading the word however we can....we have no choice as the media refuses to do its job.

I am now a proud signator on:

Please look at the evidence and join me.

A Rediscovered Masterpiece - Last seen in 1828


It is a rare treat to see such a beautifully painted head.


The Art Institute of Chicago has a landmark British painting: "The Captive Slave" (1827) by British portraitist John Philip Simpson. It has not been seen in public for 180 years.


Here is a detail.


This is the entire painting and it clearly displays Simpson's tremendous technical skills.

John Philip Simpson was known primarily as a portrait painter and was once a studio assistant to Sir Thomas Lawrence. In 1827, Simpson took a great professional risk to create a work that expressed his deeply held anti-slavery beliefs.

X-ray photography revealed that Simpson composed "The Captive Slave" on a used canvas, which had been previously painted.

The fact that he painted it on a discarded canvas suggests that he made it on impulse, and of his own volition, rather than as a commissioned work.

Douglas Druick of The Art Institute of Chicago described Simpson's engagement with a politically incendiary topic and suggests that the painting was intended as a condemnation of contemporary slavery, and a personal declaration of support for the Abolition Movement.

Avoid the Dreadful Bubble Wrap Menace


There are many delightful uses for Bubble Wrap - as in this portrait by Hendrik Kerstens below.


We live in a bubble wrap world.


But. . .


WARNING:

If you plan to wrap and ship your work to a client or gallery - do NOT allow bubble wrap to come in direct contact with the surface of an oil painting.

Unless, of course, you plan to enjoy the uniform pattern of dots that will appear on the surface of your painting.


Use it and lose it.

I do not have any archival or fool-proof method to correct this "bad chemistry" problem created by bubble wrap.

I cover the painted surface with newsprint or brown paper to prevent any bubble wrap from coming in contact with the painted surface.


I have spoken with a number of artists about this problem. Many are heartbroken that they have had to repaint their work.

Bryan C. recently emailed me with his comment that he was able to save his artwork:

"You asked me to let you know if re-misting the artwork with the same varnish would correct the problem. I am delighted to say that it worked!! The varnish is now in the drying stage and the marks are gone. Just to remind you that the marks were not in the oil paint itself, they were just in the resin."

NOTE: I never use any spray varnish on my work -it's a no-no. I prefer Winsor-Newton Conserv Art glossy (it eventually dulls to a "satin" finish) to protect my painted surface.

Bryan is currently experimenting with other ways to save his bubble-wrap-wrecked works and I will post his findings.

However, the best way to deal with the bubble wrap problem is to know about it and prevent problems from happening. Chemistry and the knowlege of how to make our works archival are important - don't take chances.

In Search of Perfection


"Always live up to your standards - by lowering them, if necessary."
Mignon McLaughlin

"
The most difficult part of attaining perfection is finding something to do for an encore. ~Author Unknown


At some point it may serve us to decide that a particular painting is complete and that we can call it quits.

Seeking excellence is one thing; never finding anything totally satisfactory is quite another.

Perfection is the obstacle of creation and the enemy of achievement (and you can quote me on this).

At some point we've got to say, "This is good. And this is enough."

If we cannot do this, we'll never get anything done. And isn't that the exact opposite of what we want?

“A beautiful thing is never perfect.” ~
Danish Proverb

“The artist who aims at perfection in everything achieves it in nothing.” ~
Eugene Delacroix

“People throw away what they could have by insisting on perfection, which they cannot have, and looking for it where they will never find it” ~
Edith Schaeffer

"Striving for excellence motivates you; striving for perfection is demoralizing." ~
Harriet Braiker

"
Certain flaws are necessary for the whole. It would seem strange if old friends lacked certain quirks.
"
~
Goethe

"
Ring the bells that still can ring
Forget your perfect offering.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in.
~Leonard Cohen

"
To escape criticism - do nothing, say nothing, be nothing.
"
~Elbert Hubbard

"
Only in grammar can you be more than perfect.
"
~
William Safire

"
Better a diamond with a flaw than a pebble without.
"
~Confucius

When you aim for perfection, you discover it's a moving target. ~George Fisher

Once you accept the fact that you're not perfect, then you develop some confidence. ~Rosalynn Carter

Olympic Class New Hampshire Eccentric: Abbott Handerson Thayer (1849 – 1921)


On hearing of Thayer's death, John Singer Sargent said, "Too bad he's gone. He was the best of them."


Because of the quality of the filtered light here, the Monadnock Region of New Hampshire has been home to many artists - and some are really interesting. . . like Thayer.


Abbott Thayer was obsessed with how nature hides it denizens in plain sight - and thus became the father of modern camouflage.


"Abbott Handerson Thayer was a thicket of peculiarities."
- Richard S. Meryman, Jr., 2006, Dublin, NH.


The following is by Richard S. Meryman, Jr. from a talk at the Library in Dublin, NH, 2006:

Abbott Thayer is probably the best-remembered of Dublin's artists. His early work, like that of many of his contemporaries, consisted mainly of commissioned portraits of wealthy patrons, and he was considered by many to be one of the great portrait painters of his day.

However, his present artistic reputation rests principally on a series of mythical and mystical winged figures, and of landscapes, mainly of Mount Monadnock.


Abbott Handerson Thayer, born in Boston in 1849, grew up in Keene as the son of a horse-and-buggy family doctor.

In the late 1880s, after study in France and a spell in New York, Thayer returned to Keene for summers, where he painted and gave painting lessons. One of his students was Mary Amory Greene, stepdaughter of Mrs. John Singleton Copley Greene.


Mrs. John S. C. Greene had plenty of money. In 1872 she built one of Dublin's first summer cottages on the Old Harrisville Road. Ten years later she bought the Phillips farm, comprising most of the south side of Dublin Lake, and she parceled out acreage among relatives and Boston intellectuals.

One parcel, near what I still think of as the Grenville Clark house, she gave to her aspiring artist stepdaughter, Mary Amory Greene.


Young Mary Amory traveled to Keene by train from Harrisville for her art lessons with Abbott Thayer. Thayer was a needy genius, catnip to the protective instincts of some women. Mary Amory became one of Thayer's devoted acolytes, even following her mentor to New York and becoming an informal secretary.

In 1888 she presented Thayer with three of her Dublin acres and built him a summer house and studio on the land high above the lake. Now Mary Amory had her teacher next door.


Another devoted acolyte was Emmaline Beach, a tiny sprite of a woman with reddish gold hair. When Thayer's first wife, Kate, was diagnosed with melancholia and banished to a sanatorium, he was left to care for their three children, Mary, Gerald and Gladys.

The gentle, enduringly saintly – and efficient – Emma took over the household. Thayer called her his fairy godmother. When Kate died of a lung infection in 1891, Emma and Thayer were married.


Abbott Thayer required saints. He was an Olympic class eccentric. He was, he admitted, a "jumper from extreme to extreme," a condition we would now call bipolar and which he described as "the Abbott pendulum."

There were exhilarated highs of emotions and messianic convictions. At times of "allwellity" he was his essential self – a man of ingratiating charm, grace and generosity. He presided over a house that was a cocoon of culture, filled with music, literature read aloud, discourses on art, philosophy and the secrets of the natural world.

While he painted, he often whistled Beethoven. At other times he played the violin given him by George de Forest Brush. Brush and Thayer had been friends since their art school days in New York and Paris.

Brush moved to Dublin to be near Thayer and the two families were close companions, snow shoeing and ice skating in the winter, and enjoying long fireside evenings passed in abstruse discussion of philosophy and literature. Both families educated their children at home, rather than corrupt the purity of youth with the confinement of formal education.


Thayer never went to church, believing that formal religion smacked of "hypocrisy and narrowness." Central to his work was Emersonian Transcendentalism, which taught that God permeates nature.

He settled in Dublin in part because of "the wild grandeur" of Monadnock which to him loomed up like a sacred totem, "a natural cloister" – and he painted it as such. Art for him was "a no-man's land of immortal beauty where every step leads to God.

His artistic mission was "unsullied purity; spiritual truth" – pictures of "highest human soul beauty." This crystallized in 1887 in a winged portrait of his 11-year-old Mary, painted during a summer in Keene.

Virginal girls with wings became a theme of sorts. To him they were the "infinite beauty of angelic women." But not angels per se. Daughter Gladys said that her father added wings to his beautiful subjects to make each "a creature of all time."


Thayer's standards were impossibly high and he was forever doomed to fall short. His jumbled studio was like a storage attic filled with works in progress. He never felt his paintings were finished.

Once at the Harrisville railroad station he uncrated a painting waiting to be shipped to a purchaser and reworked it by lantern light.

He believed that his act of painting was dictation from God. In the times when inspired creativity flagged, when God went away for other chores, Thayer kept working, but felt that he ruined what he called the Godgiven passages.

In 1906 he hired my father, Richard Meryman Sr., to copy and preserve those passages. Often several versions of the same picture were carried forward simultaneously, with Thayer working on each until he settled on one of them as the finished painting.


For young artists like my father and Alexander James who were mentored by Thayer, his high octane, soul-expanding mind made him a mesmerizing teacher.

The artist William Lathrop said, "You knew his heart ached with love for the thing he painted and one's heart aches with love for the lover." My father was a devoted acolyte who returned year after year, becoming a member of the extended family.


The drama in Thayer's works lies in the tremendous intensity of his emotions. He was a thicket of peculiarities. His bipolar lows several times landed him in sanitariums. In his depressions he suffered "a sick disgust with myself."

He experienced "oceans of hypochondria." Health was always a topic – complaints of sleeplessness, anxieties, exhaustion, headaches, bad eyes, petty illnesses. Tuberculosis was rife in those days and the accepted treatment was fresh mountain air.

As a precaution, the whole family, winter and summer, slept in lean-tos in the woods. Even in winter, windows were left open. Thayer started each winter in a pair of long johns. As the seasons warmed, he cut off sections, till by summer they were shorts.


The house had been built solely for summer, so it had no interior sheathing and no insulation. It was heated in the winter with fireplaces and wood stoves. By the time meals traveled from the kitchen to the dining table, the food was usually cold.

For years the only running water was from a hand pump in the kitchen. There was no electricity and only an outdoor privy. He believed that everything modern broke the bond between man and nature.

His daughter Gladys described her home as "something of a camp," but for all Thayer's asceticism, the family always had a housekeeper/cook, one in particular whose beautiful daughter posed for several paintings.


From his boyhood in Keene, Thayer was fascinated by the natural world, an obsession later intensified by his Transcendentalism. Animals roamed the house at will – owls, rabbits, woodchucks, two prairie dogs named Napoleon and Josephine and a crow named Satan. A pet spider monkey was discovered brushing its teeth with Emma's toothbrush.

Thayer painted in the morning. In the afternoon, while his assistants – "the boys" – copied the morning's work, he immersed himself in nature, roaming the countryside or paddling his canoe on Dublin Lake.

He was a respected ornithologist. With his son Gerald he made extensive bird collecting trips, amassing a huge collection of skins – 1,500 by 1905. Thayer could skin a small bird in the dark.


Saving Monadnock

Thayer constantly prowled Monadnock and its "...virgin forest where time alone has left his traces, where his mark is on every stage of growth, from moss-covered soil through tiny saplings to the perfect tree to the solemn skeleton that faces a few winters' storms before crashing down to lie still at last and begin the gentle change through all the beautiful mossy stages back to mother earth."

The summit had for him "the mysterious exaltation of mere height, and with it the inexpressible experience of SILENCE coupled with light and sight."


In 1910, walking the eastern ridge of Monadnock just off the Pumpelly Trail, Thayer discovered a sign announcing, "PRIVATE WAY / NO PASSING." It had been nailed on a tree by order of a wealthy widow named Louise Amory. In partnership with her son-in-law, the Reverend George Weld, she had bought some 900 acres of the great bowl of Monadnock.

For Thayer the sign, plus the road and two houses Amory had built high up the mountain, were a blasphemy to its "primeval, wild nature purity."

He feared that "...now, electricity with motors etc., backed by money, has swept away the old comfortable guarantee of the impracticability of occupying the high slopes of the mountain. Villas, villas, villas will insidiously creep up along those roads that these people have already built."


He vowed that "those spruces, after all the centuries of hermit and olive backed thrush voices, shall not know the Victor talking machine if I can stop it." And stop it he did. He admonished Amory and Weld: "You might as well write your names across the face of the Birth of Venus or the Sistine Madonna because you had bought it for $200,000, as write with your road across the upraised face of the until now shrine of many pilgrims."

Louise Amory was a woman of intellect and steely whims and did not take kindly to such lecturing. But Abbott and Gerald Thayer did not stop at lectures. They mapped the lots in question, traced their history, consulted legal authorities, and enlisted the help of the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests.

Concluding that those wild mountain ledges were still owned by the descendants of the original Masonian Proprietors, the Society located 89 of the heirs, scattered as far away as England and Mexico. A court ruled in favor of the Society. So the pristine, safeguarded Monadnock of today is largely the legacy of Abbott Thayer's prodigious passion.


The Origins of Camouflage

His worship of nature led him to a passion that he called "his second child" and rivaled his painting. It was concealing coloration -- how nature hides it denizens in plain sight.

He once wrote: "...for four years this set of discoveries my poor brain has been vexed with -- have kept me at work hours almost every night with pencil and pad under my pillow, and this has kept me drawn off so that I never filled up to the point of running out of the painting faucet."

In 1909 Concealing Coloration in the Animal Kingdom was published, written by Abbott and Gerald and with illustrations painted by Thayer, Meryman, and another acolyte, Rockwell Kent. Thayer argued that birds, mammals, insects, reptiles are concealed from prey and predators by eliminating all contrast with the background.

This is accomplished by blending – mimicking the background – and by "dazzle" – strong, arbitrary color markings which disrupt the creature's contours, thus erasing outline, shape and identity. He also postulated the now widely accepted theory of "countershading."

He explained that "animals are painted by Nature darkest on those parts which tend to be most lighted by the sky's light, and vice versa. "Wiping out the gradations of light and shade that give shape, nature flattens an opaque animal and reduces it to a blank space.


World War I redirected Thayer's crusade for concealing coloration. In 1916, powered by "future Kaiser fear," he virtually stopped painting and focused his fanatical energy on convincing the Allies that the same principles that made animals invisible to predators could be used to conceal troops and their weapons.

He said that if Navy ships were painted white, they would blend with the sky and be invisible at night. The proof, he insisted, was the iceberg struck by the Titanic.

The French read the Thayers' book and adapted its principles to conceal trains, gun emplacements, vehicles, even horses. They named the technique camouflage, after a small exploding mine that threw up gas and smoke to conceal troop movements. The Germans studied his book to help them conceal battleships.

So Abbott Thayer is the father of the dazzle pattern that is now universal in military clothing. The brainchild of this worshiper of virgin purity now bedecks not only soldiers, but civilian T-shirts, bikinis, handbags, slacks, etc. etc.


Thayer's children: Mary and Gerald

Sparked in part by Thayer's cousin, the muralist Barry Faulkner from Keene, the American Army formed a most unmilitary Camouflage Corps, which was headed by Augustus Saint-Gauden's son, Homer, and included Faulkner and Richard Meryman.


Thayer's home and studio.

But Thayer's ship camouflage schemes were ignored, though he rained frantic letters of explanation on the Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Franklin D. Roosevelt.


After the war, Thayer enjoyed a period of relative peace. He returned to his fervor for Monadnock, painting Monadnock Angel, an angel with arms extended, protecting the mountain.

But his health had been compromised. He suffered a series of heart attacks, the last of which killed him on May 29, 1921, at age 72.


Gerald Thayer, barefooted, carried Thayer's ashes to the heights of the Pumpelly trail just before sunset. As he afterwards wrote, "In this gay solemnness and translucent beauty were given forever back to wind and sun and stars the scanty mortal remains of our artist, father, friend.

It will be proper and just for any of us so desiring to regard Monadnock, the mountain, as in a very real sense his monument."

On hearing of Thayer's death, John Singer Sargent said, "Too bad he's gone. He was the best of them."