Olympic Class New Hampshire Eccentric: Abbott Handerson Thayer (1849 – 1921)


On hearing of Thayer's death, John Singer Sargent said, "Too bad he's gone. He was the best of them."


Because of the quality of the filtered light here, the Monadnock Region of New Hampshire has been home to many artists - and some are really interesting. . . like Thayer.


Abbott Thayer was obsessed with how nature hides it denizens in plain sight - and thus became the father of modern camouflage.


"Abbott Handerson Thayer was a thicket of peculiarities."
- Richard S. Meryman, Jr., 2006, Dublin, NH.


The following is by Richard S. Meryman, Jr. from a talk at the Library in Dublin, NH, 2006:

Abbott Thayer is probably the best-remembered of Dublin's artists. His early work, like that of many of his contemporaries, consisted mainly of commissioned portraits of wealthy patrons, and he was considered by many to be one of the great portrait painters of his day.

However, his present artistic reputation rests principally on a series of mythical and mystical winged figures, and of landscapes, mainly of Mount Monadnock.


Abbott Handerson Thayer, born in Boston in 1849, grew up in Keene as the son of a horse-and-buggy family doctor.

In the late 1880s, after study in France and a spell in New York, Thayer returned to Keene for summers, where he painted and gave painting lessons. One of his students was Mary Amory Greene, stepdaughter of Mrs. John Singleton Copley Greene.


Mrs. John S. C. Greene had plenty of money. In 1872 she built one of Dublin's first summer cottages on the Old Harrisville Road. Ten years later she bought the Phillips farm, comprising most of the south side of Dublin Lake, and she parceled out acreage among relatives and Boston intellectuals.

One parcel, near what I still think of as the Grenville Clark house, she gave to her aspiring artist stepdaughter, Mary Amory Greene.


Young Mary Amory traveled to Keene by train from Harrisville for her art lessons with Abbott Thayer. Thayer was a needy genius, catnip to the protective instincts of some women. Mary Amory became one of Thayer's devoted acolytes, even following her mentor to New York and becoming an informal secretary.

In 1888 she presented Thayer with three of her Dublin acres and built him a summer house and studio on the land high above the lake. Now Mary Amory had her teacher next door.


Another devoted acolyte was Emmaline Beach, a tiny sprite of a woman with reddish gold hair. When Thayer's first wife, Kate, was diagnosed with melancholia and banished to a sanatorium, he was left to care for their three children, Mary, Gerald and Gladys.

The gentle, enduringly saintly – and efficient – Emma took over the household. Thayer called her his fairy godmother. When Kate died of a lung infection in 1891, Emma and Thayer were married.


Abbott Thayer required saints. He was an Olympic class eccentric. He was, he admitted, a "jumper from extreme to extreme," a condition we would now call bipolar and which he described as "the Abbott pendulum."

There were exhilarated highs of emotions and messianic convictions. At times of "allwellity" he was his essential self – a man of ingratiating charm, grace and generosity. He presided over a house that was a cocoon of culture, filled with music, literature read aloud, discourses on art, philosophy and the secrets of the natural world.

While he painted, he often whistled Beethoven. At other times he played the violin given him by George de Forest Brush. Brush and Thayer had been friends since their art school days in New York and Paris.

Brush moved to Dublin to be near Thayer and the two families were close companions, snow shoeing and ice skating in the winter, and enjoying long fireside evenings passed in abstruse discussion of philosophy and literature. Both families educated their children at home, rather than corrupt the purity of youth with the confinement of formal education.


Thayer never went to church, believing that formal religion smacked of "hypocrisy and narrowness." Central to his work was Emersonian Transcendentalism, which taught that God permeates nature.

He settled in Dublin in part because of "the wild grandeur" of Monadnock which to him loomed up like a sacred totem, "a natural cloister" – and he painted it as such. Art for him was "a no-man's land of immortal beauty where every step leads to God.

His artistic mission was "unsullied purity; spiritual truth" – pictures of "highest human soul beauty." This crystallized in 1887 in a winged portrait of his 11-year-old Mary, painted during a summer in Keene.

Virginal girls with wings became a theme of sorts. To him they were the "infinite beauty of angelic women." But not angels per se. Daughter Gladys said that her father added wings to his beautiful subjects to make each "a creature of all time."


Thayer's standards were impossibly high and he was forever doomed to fall short. His jumbled studio was like a storage attic filled with works in progress. He never felt his paintings were finished.

Once at the Harrisville railroad station he uncrated a painting waiting to be shipped to a purchaser and reworked it by lantern light.

He believed that his act of painting was dictation from God. In the times when inspired creativity flagged, when God went away for other chores, Thayer kept working, but felt that he ruined what he called the Godgiven passages.

In 1906 he hired my father, Richard Meryman Sr., to copy and preserve those passages. Often several versions of the same picture were carried forward simultaneously, with Thayer working on each until he settled on one of them as the finished painting.


For young artists like my father and Alexander James who were mentored by Thayer, his high octane, soul-expanding mind made him a mesmerizing teacher.

The artist William Lathrop said, "You knew his heart ached with love for the thing he painted and one's heart aches with love for the lover." My father was a devoted acolyte who returned year after year, becoming a member of the extended family.


The drama in Thayer's works lies in the tremendous intensity of his emotions. He was a thicket of peculiarities. His bipolar lows several times landed him in sanitariums. In his depressions he suffered "a sick disgust with myself."

He experienced "oceans of hypochondria." Health was always a topic – complaints of sleeplessness, anxieties, exhaustion, headaches, bad eyes, petty illnesses. Tuberculosis was rife in those days and the accepted treatment was fresh mountain air.

As a precaution, the whole family, winter and summer, slept in lean-tos in the woods. Even in winter, windows were left open. Thayer started each winter in a pair of long johns. As the seasons warmed, he cut off sections, till by summer they were shorts.


The house had been built solely for summer, so it had no interior sheathing and no insulation. It was heated in the winter with fireplaces and wood stoves. By the time meals traveled from the kitchen to the dining table, the food was usually cold.

For years the only running water was from a hand pump in the kitchen. There was no electricity and only an outdoor privy. He believed that everything modern broke the bond between man and nature.

His daughter Gladys described her home as "something of a camp," but for all Thayer's asceticism, the family always had a housekeeper/cook, one in particular whose beautiful daughter posed for several paintings.


From his boyhood in Keene, Thayer was fascinated by the natural world, an obsession later intensified by his Transcendentalism. Animals roamed the house at will – owls, rabbits, woodchucks, two prairie dogs named Napoleon and Josephine and a crow named Satan. A pet spider monkey was discovered brushing its teeth with Emma's toothbrush.

Thayer painted in the morning. In the afternoon, while his assistants – "the boys" – copied the morning's work, he immersed himself in nature, roaming the countryside or paddling his canoe on Dublin Lake.

He was a respected ornithologist. With his son Gerald he made extensive bird collecting trips, amassing a huge collection of skins – 1,500 by 1905. Thayer could skin a small bird in the dark.


Saving Monadnock

Thayer constantly prowled Monadnock and its "...virgin forest where time alone has left his traces, where his mark is on every stage of growth, from moss-covered soil through tiny saplings to the perfect tree to the solemn skeleton that faces a few winters' storms before crashing down to lie still at last and begin the gentle change through all the beautiful mossy stages back to mother earth."

The summit had for him "the mysterious exaltation of mere height, and with it the inexpressible experience of SILENCE coupled with light and sight."


In 1910, walking the eastern ridge of Monadnock just off the Pumpelly Trail, Thayer discovered a sign announcing, "PRIVATE WAY / NO PASSING." It had been nailed on a tree by order of a wealthy widow named Louise Amory. In partnership with her son-in-law, the Reverend George Weld, she had bought some 900 acres of the great bowl of Monadnock.

For Thayer the sign, plus the road and two houses Amory had built high up the mountain, were a blasphemy to its "primeval, wild nature purity."

He feared that "...now, electricity with motors etc., backed by money, has swept away the old comfortable guarantee of the impracticability of occupying the high slopes of the mountain. Villas, villas, villas will insidiously creep up along those roads that these people have already built."


He vowed that "those spruces, after all the centuries of hermit and olive backed thrush voices, shall not know the Victor talking machine if I can stop it." And stop it he did. He admonished Amory and Weld: "You might as well write your names across the face of the Birth of Venus or the Sistine Madonna because you had bought it for $200,000, as write with your road across the upraised face of the until now shrine of many pilgrims."

Louise Amory was a woman of intellect and steely whims and did not take kindly to such lecturing. But Abbott and Gerald Thayer did not stop at lectures. They mapped the lots in question, traced their history, consulted legal authorities, and enlisted the help of the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests.

Concluding that those wild mountain ledges were still owned by the descendants of the original Masonian Proprietors, the Society located 89 of the heirs, scattered as far away as England and Mexico. A court ruled in favor of the Society. So the pristine, safeguarded Monadnock of today is largely the legacy of Abbott Thayer's prodigious passion.


The Origins of Camouflage

His worship of nature led him to a passion that he called "his second child" and rivaled his painting. It was concealing coloration -- how nature hides it denizens in plain sight.

He once wrote: "...for four years this set of discoveries my poor brain has been vexed with -- have kept me at work hours almost every night with pencil and pad under my pillow, and this has kept me drawn off so that I never filled up to the point of running out of the painting faucet."

In 1909 Concealing Coloration in the Animal Kingdom was published, written by Abbott and Gerald and with illustrations painted by Thayer, Meryman, and another acolyte, Rockwell Kent. Thayer argued that birds, mammals, insects, reptiles are concealed from prey and predators by eliminating all contrast with the background.

This is accomplished by blending – mimicking the background – and by "dazzle" – strong, arbitrary color markings which disrupt the creature's contours, thus erasing outline, shape and identity. He also postulated the now widely accepted theory of "countershading."

He explained that "animals are painted by Nature darkest on those parts which tend to be most lighted by the sky's light, and vice versa. "Wiping out the gradations of light and shade that give shape, nature flattens an opaque animal and reduces it to a blank space.


World War I redirected Thayer's crusade for concealing coloration. In 1916, powered by "future Kaiser fear," he virtually stopped painting and focused his fanatical energy on convincing the Allies that the same principles that made animals invisible to predators could be used to conceal troops and their weapons.

He said that if Navy ships were painted white, they would blend with the sky and be invisible at night. The proof, he insisted, was the iceberg struck by the Titanic.

The French read the Thayers' book and adapted its principles to conceal trains, gun emplacements, vehicles, even horses. They named the technique camouflage, after a small exploding mine that threw up gas and smoke to conceal troop movements. The Germans studied his book to help them conceal battleships.

So Abbott Thayer is the father of the dazzle pattern that is now universal in military clothing. The brainchild of this worshiper of virgin purity now bedecks not only soldiers, but civilian T-shirts, bikinis, handbags, slacks, etc. etc.


Thayer's children: Mary and Gerald

Sparked in part by Thayer's cousin, the muralist Barry Faulkner from Keene, the American Army formed a most unmilitary Camouflage Corps, which was headed by Augustus Saint-Gauden's son, Homer, and included Faulkner and Richard Meryman.


Thayer's home and studio.

But Thayer's ship camouflage schemes were ignored, though he rained frantic letters of explanation on the Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Franklin D. Roosevelt.


After the war, Thayer enjoyed a period of relative peace. He returned to his fervor for Monadnock, painting Monadnock Angel, an angel with arms extended, protecting the mountain.

But his health had been compromised. He suffered a series of heart attacks, the last of which killed him on May 29, 1921, at age 72.


Gerald Thayer, barefooted, carried Thayer's ashes to the heights of the Pumpelly trail just before sunset. As he afterwards wrote, "In this gay solemnness and translucent beauty were given forever back to wind and sun and stars the scanty mortal remains of our artist, father, friend.

It will be proper and just for any of us so desiring to regard Monadnock, the mountain, as in a very real sense his monument."

On hearing of Thayer's death, John Singer Sargent said, "Too bad he's gone. He was the best of them."

If You Happen to be in London this Summer....

Old Master Paintings from a Private Collection to be Offered at Sotheby's on London.

The word Venice is, to many, evocative of grand canals and sleepy backwaters, lined with the facades of beautiful palazzi. What lies behind those facades, however, often remains a mystery.


Antonio Balestra (1666-1740) "Flora" Oil on Canvas

What lies behind those facades, however, often remains a mystery. Sotheby’s sale, the Splendour of Venice, to be held in London on Tuesday July 6, 2010, allows a glimpse into the dazzlingly beautiful world that existed inside some of Venice’s most splendid palazzi during some of the most prosperous and charmed years of the Venetian Republic.

The sale will consist of some 64 fine examples of Venetian painting and craftsmanship from the 17th and 18th centuries, put together over some 30 years by a private European family in order to adorn their palazzo in the Veneto region.

And if I win the Lottery between now and July 6 I'll be there. In the meantime, I hope to find the e-catalog - the link eludes me for now.

And if you're still in town, here's another show to see:


Caravaggio's "Friends and Foes" ~ A Major Exhibition at Whitfield Fine Art, London

Caravaggio was a man who made enemies easily. A quick tempered, intolerant artistic genius who was fond of a drink and prone to violence, he was frequently in trouble with the authorities and eventually fled Rome after being accused of murdering a former friend in a gang fight.


This uncouth upstart also outraged the artistic establishment by by-passing traditional training methods and giving young painters the idea that all they had to do was to put brush to palette and bare canvas. Yet he also had great friends and passionate followers and his revolutionary techniques inspired artists across Europe.


The extraordinary range of emotions aroused by Caravaggio is portrayed in Caravaggio’s Friends & Foes, a major loan exhibition held by Whitfield Fine Art through 23 July 2010.

The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us!

The surprising truth about what motivates us and it's not just Money. But most artists have already figured this one out.



Here's the explanation - a fascinating myth buster that everyone can understand!


How to Roll a Painting


Sometimes people ask me how to roll a painting to ship or store. This is a great way to remember that the painted side is always on the outside - or the paint will crack.



Don't bother to fiddle with the sound - this is a silent flick.

Watch the unrolling and installation of the massive canvas by Thomas Sully, "The Passage of the Delaware," as this mammoth painting is prepared and hung.

This in Boston's MFAs new "Art of the Americas Wing" - opening this November.

Why Didn't I Think of That?

An entertaining and cheeky music video by the Franco-American band.



These clever folks offer a wink at art history as band members playfully reconstruct famous paintings in an off the wall lyrical interpretation all their own.

Murray Hill Incorporated is Running for Congress!

Until now, corporations only influenced politics with high-paid lobbyists and backroom deals. But today, thanks to an enlightened Supreme Court, Corporations now have all the rights the founding fathers meant for us.

That's why Murray Hill Incorporated is taking democracy's next step - running for Congress.


“Let’s Franchise Democracy!” Franchise Opportunity Here.

National Icon "Granny D" dies at 100




NOTE: Late last Sumer (2009), I was able to arrange for Doris "Granny D"Haddock to sit for me. She is to be my first portrait in the new series I 'm planning, entitled, "People who Tell The Truth."

It was a fun shoot. She was feeling good and feisty that day and wore her infamous hat. One of these pictures is posted below.

I am so grateful to have these reference photos and I am sorry that Doris won't be here to see the result. I like the quote below and may letter it into her portrait.
- Karin

“You have the power of one,” she said. “And if you use it for something that’s bigger than you are, people will come.”
- Granny D



Granny D also understood and supported our efforts to spread the Truth of 9/11.

Doris “Granny D” Haddock died peacefully today in her Dublin, New Hampshire family home at 7:18 p.m. Tuesday, March 9, 2010. She was 100 years old. Born in 1910 in Laconia, New Hampshire, she attended Emerson College and lived through two world wars and the Great Depression.

She was an activist for her community and for her country, remaining active until the return of chronic respiratory problems four days ago.


She walked across the United States at the age of 90 in the year 2000, in a successful effort to promote the passage of the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Act.

In 2004, Granny D decided to challenge incumbent Senator Judd Gregg for his US Senate seat. She hoped to demonstrate that ordinary people can run for office and win with the support of small donations from individuals.


Despite a shortened, grassroots campaign without the benefit of any advertising dollars, Granny D garnered an impressive 34% of the vote. During the past year five years, Granny D has traveled the country speaking about campaign finance reform and working on behalf of legislation for publicly-funded elections in New Hampshire.

In the 1960s, she and her husband, James Haddock, Sr., were instrumental in halting planned nuclear tests that would have destroyed a native fishing village and region in Alaska.

The following was written in The Keene Sentinel. Wednesday, March 10, 2010:

DUBLIN, NH — Doris Haddock of Dublin, who walked across the country at age 90 to promote campaign finance reform and later waged a quixotic campaign for U.S. Senate, has died. She was 100.

Haddock died Tuesday of chronic respiratory illness at her home in Dublin, said spokeswoman and family friend Maude Salinger. She was surrounded by her son, daughter-in-law, grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

In 2000, Haddock walked 3,200 miles to draw attention to campaign finance reform. In 2004, at age 94 and bolstered by her new notoriety, she ran for the U.S. Senate against Republican Judd Gregg.

The subtitle of her autobiography, written with Dennis Burke, was “You’re Never Too Old to Raise a Little Hell.”

“Her age wasn’t a factor in what she did,” Salinger said. “She never gave up. Until the end, she advocated for public funding. She would have wanted people to know that democracy and government belongs to us.”

Haddock was true to her cause right up until her death.

When the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in January to ease limits on corporate campaign contributions, she fired back:


“The Supreme Court, representing a radical fringe that does not share the despair of the grand majority of Americans, has today made things considerably worse by undoing the modest reforms I walked for and went to jail for, and that tens of thousands of other Americans fought very hard to see enacted. ...


“The Supreme Court now opens the floodgates to usher in a new tsunami of corporate money into politics.”

In an interview with The Sentinel near the time of her 100th birthday, in January, Haddock said every month she continued to get hundreds of e-mails and letters from supporters around the world.

The HBO documentary “Run Granny Run,” which chronicled her cross-country walk, helped to fuel her cause and her legend.

Many told her she inspired them to stand up for something they believe in.

She printed the e-mails and kept them in a thick folder in her bedroom, she said.

She spent several hours a day on her computer, tracking campaign finance reform measures across the country, writing speeches and newspaper columns editorials on the subject and responding to e-mails from her fans.

She walked regularly — a mile or two several days a week — a practice she credited for helping to keep her young.

Haddock said her passion for taking big money out of politics at the state and federal levels helped her to keep going.

Doing so, she said, would bring true democracy to the country. That’s a legacy she longed to leave behind for her 16 great-grandchildren.

“I’ve been working on it for 10 years,” she said in January. “It will mean that anyone can run for office if they have the will and the guts.”

“But today, it costs so much to run for office, and it’s costing more and more all the time, and there are very few people who have the money to do it. They have to get it and they get it from special interests or from corporations.”

Haddock was born Jan. 24, 1910, in Laconia and attended Emerson College before marrying James Haddock. She later worked at a local shoe company for 20 years.

She spent a decade caring for her husband after he was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. He died in 1993.

After retiring in 1972, Haddock became more active in community affairs.

In 1997, Haddock began to get involved with the cause that would become her life’s mission. She became interested in campaign finance reform after the defeat of the first attempt of Sens. John McCain and Russ Feingold to remove unregulated “soft” money from campaigns in 1995.

She gathered more than 100,000 signatures for a petition in support of the McCain-Feingold bill.

But a year later, disappointed with the response from her local representatives, the 89-year-old decided to begin training for a walk across the country as a champion for the cause.

Inspiration for her cross-country trek came from the Tuesday Morning Academy, a group of women in Dublin who met every Tuesday at 8 a.m. to do ballet exercises and discuss world affairs.

Her walk began Jan. 1, 1999, in Los Angeles and, 3,200 miles later, she arrived in Washington D.C., trailed by a crowd of about 2,200 supporters.

Covering about 10 miles a day, Haddock walked through more than 1,000 miles of desert, climbed the Appalachian Range in blizzard conditions and even skied 100 miles after snowfall made roadside walking impossible. She started in near-obscurity, but soon was discovered by local and national media.

The response from people along the way was one of the things she’ll always remember from the walk, Haddock said.
“I had no money,” she said. “I walked as a pilgrim across the states.

“I walked until given shelter. I fasted until given food.”

And she shared her message with anyone who would listen, Haddock said.

“I stopped at every dog fight, any place, just so that my name is known and my name means public funding of elections,” she said. “It’s got to come. It’s going to.”

Burke, who co-wrote Haddock’s memoir, met Haddock as she walked through Arizona on her way to Washington.

“Doris was one of the youngest people I have ever known. She was a little kid about her country — so in love she was with it and so excited for it always,” he said early today.

In 2004, Haddock jumped into the Senate race on the last day to file after the presumptive Democratic nominee dropped out when his campaign manager was accused of financial fraud. A few months before the election, she officially changed her name to “Granny D,” but stressed that the “D” stood for “Doris,” not her party affiliation.

On Election Day, Judd Gregg won. But Haddock still saw the 34 percent of the vote she captured as a victory.

“I wasn’t going to just let him have it without giving a fight,” she said.

Mark Fernald, a former state senator and a Sharon resident who practices law in Peterborough, said Granny D was a woman of remarkable poise and commitment, which made it easy for people to naturally be drawn to her.

“She was genuine,” Fernald said this morning. “She had a way about her, and people liked her. She was out to tell her story; she didn’t put people down, she didn’t lecture, she talked about what she believed in and why we needed this change (campaign finance reform) to change our country.”

In recent years, she founded a group that pushed the state Legislature to create the Citizen Funded Election Task Force and attended the task force’s weekly meetings. She was honored at a Statehouse ceremony in January to mark her 100th birthday.

She was working on a new book,
“My Bohemian Century,” which focuses on her college days and her Senate campaign and is expected to be published this spring. Haddock had stayed with Burke’s family in Phoenix last month to complete work on it, he said.

“Two things that people might not know, but should,” Fernald said, “she was a marvelous writer and speaker, and she wrote all her own stuff. And it was good. She really thought very deeply about what it meant to be an American, to live in a democracy. She’d get up there, and make these speeches, at age 88, 90, 92, and she never wore reading glasses.

“In some ways, she seemed like she was ageless — the mind of a 25 year old, the eyes of a 35 year old ... and the legs of a 40 year old.”

In the book’s dedication, Haddock offers readers advice:
“You have to keep the young adventurer inside your heart alive long enough for it to someday re-emerge. It may take some coaxing and some courage, but that person is in you always — never growing old.”

In February,
“Sources of Strength: Granny D at 100” was published. The book focuses on how she’s managed to live such a long and active life and includes the text of several of her speeches.

Both Democrats and Republicans offered condolences Tuesday night.

“Her commitment to fair and open democracy should inspire us all to work even harder for reform,” state Democratic Party Chairman Ray Buckley.

“We are always saddened when someone with a genuine commitment to their values and principles passes away,” said Republican Party Chairman John H. Sununu. “Granny D was an unwavering advocate for her beliefs, and her tireless efforts inspired many Granite Staters to participate in our political process,” he said.

Haddock told The Sentinel in January that she hopes her legacy will transcend politics.

“You have the power of one,” she said. “And if you use it for something that’s bigger than you are, people will come.”

Dear Readers,

I've gotten so many letters of concern from you all – thank you. I want to assure you that I haven't quit painting nor do I intend to abandon this blog.


But something huge shifted in my thinking....and it was because of a portrait I painted.

I wrote the letter to the editor of my local newspaper (below) and it's been crazy around my studio ever since. My focus has been on learning and sharing information about what really happened on 9/11 and it ate up a lot of time and energy.

In the eyes of some, this has trashed my reputation and my career - telling the Truth isn't easy - but if I am to live with myself, I have to do this.

I've been putting this information on yet another blog: http://nhtruth.blogspot.com Please check it out and use the index in the right-hand column.

So how does this relate to my art? This has been the tough part to figure out for sure.

So far my plan is to begin working on a series of portraits entitled “People Who Tell The Truth.” Stay tuned and I'll explain as I continue.

Meanwhile here is my Letter to the Editor I wrote that started it all:


Letter to the Editor of the Keene Sentinel:

I am a portrait artist, and my world radically shifted when I was hired to paint a young woman who died in the WTC North Tower on 9/11/01. Her image captured my heart and I couldn’t rest until I learned more about why and how she died.

I had never before considered the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job. It was easy to ignore those nagging rumors that the three buildings collapsed as a result of controlled demolition. But as I began to read, the “official” story made less and less sense.

When I finally saw the scientific evidence of controlled demolition, I was shocked. Since then I’ve heard credible eyewitnesses and whistleblowers speaking out – but the media isn’t listening and doesn’t report.

The major problem I have found in talking about 9/11 is that most people simply refuse to examine the evidence.

It is understandable – but not acceptable – that they prefer to ignore those things that disturb a comfortable view of reality. It is hard for anybody to question deeply held beliefs – even when all evidence clearly shows that belief to be mistaken.

In my efforts to spread the truth of 9/11, I have joined “Vote for Answers NH.org” and am seeking signatures on a petition to ask our town to call for a new and independent investigation of all of the evidence surrounding the tragic events of 9/11.

If you are reading this and are one of those who can muster the courage to examine new evidence, please contact me and I’ll give or send you a DVD entitled “9/11: Blueprint for Truth.” You can also access this information for yourself at http://www.ae911truth.org

This is a non-partisan issue and signers are Republican, Democrat and Independent.

Sincerely,

Karin Wells
Peterborough, New Hampshire

And my offer of that Free DVD holds for ALL of you too. If you want one contact me at : See New Evidence at gmail dot com

Photobucket

Believe your eyes - they'll tell you no lies!

This is what a controlled demolition looks like.

This is WTC Building #7 being demolished at near free-fall speed on 9/11/2001. It was exploded from the bottom up - whereas both Twin Towers* were exploded from the top down.

(*Note that Jet Fuel (kerosene) does not come within 1000 degrees F of melting steel. You just cannot break the Laws of Physics.)

See the top "crimp" as WTC Building #7 begins to fall straight down into its own footprint? This is classic demolition.

Note that Building 7 was not hit by an airplane but this steel framed and reinforced 47 story sky scraper collapsed anyhow.

Building #7 contained CIA Headquarters and all of the Enron and Worldcom evidence. Even though the Insurance Company paid off because it was classified as part of the "Terrorist Attack" - nowhere in the official 9/11 Commossion Report is the destruction of this building mentioned.

You can read more about Building #7 here and see why I support a new investigation into 9/11.